Companies that diversify their logistics and use alternative routes overcome many supply chain problems.

Having a robust supply chain strategy will make firms more resilient to supply-chain disruptions. There are two kinds of supply management issues: the first has to do with the supplier side, specifically supplier selection, supplier relationship, supply planning, transportation and logistics. The second one deals with demand management issues. These are issues associated with product introduction, product line management, demand planning, product pricing and advertising preparation. Therefore, what typical techniques can companies use to enhance their capability to sustain their operations when a major disruption hits? In accordance with a recently available research, two methods are increasingly showing to work whenever a disruption happens. The initial one is known as a flexible supply base, and the second one is called economic supply incentives. Although many in the industry would contend that sourcing from the single provider cuts expenses, it can cause problems as demand varies or when it comes to a disruption. Thus, depending on numerous companies can offset the risk connected with single sourcing. On the other hand, economic supply incentives work when the buyer provides incentives to cause more vendors to enter the market. The buyer could have more flexibility this way by moving production among suppliers, specially in markets where there exists a limited amount of companies.

In supply chain management, disruption in just a route of a given transport mode can dramatically impact the whole supply chain and, in certain cases, even bring it up to a halt. As such, company leaders like P&O Ferries CEO and Maersk CEO work hard to add flexibility in the mode of transport they depend on in a proactive way. For example, some businesses utilise a versatile logistics strategy that hinges on numerous modes of transportation. They encourage their logistic partners to diversify their mode of transport to add all modes: trucks, trains, motorcycles, bicycles, vessels and even helicopters. Investing in multimodal transport practices including a mix of rail, road and maritime transportation and also considering different geographic entry points minimises the weaknesses and risks related to counting on one mode.

To avoid incurring costs, different businesses give consideration to alternate paths. For instance, as a result of long delays at major international ports in a few African states, some businesses encourage shippers to develop new channels as well as traditional tracks. This plan detects and utilises other lesser-used ports. Rather than counting on just one major commercial port, as soon as the shipping company notice heavy traffic, they redirect products to better ports over the coastline then transport them inland via rail or road. According to maritime experts, this strategy has many benefits not only in alleviating pressure on overwhelmed hubs, but additionally in the economic development of growing economies. Company leaders like AD Ports Group CEO would likely agree with this view.